David Robinson

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
  • in reply to: Lawful Rebellion #41980
    David RobinsonDavid Robinson

    Examples or templates of the Oath of Allegiance and explanaitions as to why you don’t need to send it to a baron, who are frankly useless since they did us the favour of invoking the article…..lots more evidence and facts regarding lawful dissent (we are not rebels but the name ‘lawful rebellion’ has stuck) in the files of the FB group page and on the website.



    in reply to: Council is trying to defraud me. #38440
    David RobinsonDavid Robinson

    Whereas Council tax has already been deemed illegal within a properly convened court de jure hearing (the CLC hearing) I would use that evidence within a NOTICE OF COERCION TO AID AND ABET TREASON to the corporate business (AKA “court”)…always go after the named individual(s) in person…If you have no printed name to address the Notice to then demand one within the said Notice and serve it to the manager and/or legal advisor of the so called court. I also advise serving a similar Notice on the council agent, the local chief inspector of police and anyone else involved i.e., debt collectors etc.

    You can also look for the corporate court business number on a website called ‘Company Check’ and on ‘Companies House’ to add more evidence to the fact that it is not a court of law….all propoerly convened courts of law have to be under the authority of the crown, which are actually under the authority of the people since the monarch (deposed or usurped or not) is bound by the Coronation Oath. All courts must have a jury with the rights of the jurors intact according to the common law i.e., jury nullification of unconstitutional acts and statutes.

    Within said Notice I would supply the link to the treason evidence file FCO 30/1048 as well as the transcripts of the letters between the barons committee and the (usurped and deposed) Queen when the barons petitioned the alleged monarch on the 7th February 2001 and, the further letter between the barons and Sir Robin Janvrin (QE2 private secretary at the time) sent on the 23rd March 2001 which invoked Article 61 of Magna Carta 1215. This informnation is supplied freely on Practical Lawful Dissent Facebook group and, Denounce The Deception website. You can also include the Lord Kilmuir Letter to Edward Heeath for good measure. This is also supplied within said FB group files.

    Within the petition of the barons there is evidence to the fact that the EU’s treaty of Nice (France) is treasonous. Since it is illegal to aid and abet crime, any crime, any summons or demand made by the treasonous regime cannot be lawfully adhered to whilst standing under the invocation of Article 61. Nor can it be adhered to at anytime whether or not you are in lawful dissent/rebellion…the evidence of treason is the crux of the matter.

    Everyone in the entire realm who knows of an act of treason being planned or committed MUST report that crime or be guilty of the same (misprision of treason)…that lawful demand is applicable to everyone within the realm as said, so once you have put an individual on Notice of the evidence of treason they can only continue with their demands against you whilst committing high treason at common law. With regard to Council Tax they will do just that however so be aware of that please…they cannot afford to lose the servility of the people that the CT creates…if they did then they would lose control because everyone hates that tax. It is also your duty to report the treason to the police although they will fob you off…record the attempt or just do so via lawful Notice to prove that you at least attempted to do so. Always serve Notices recorded delivery and check on track or trace who signed for the post…once someone has signed for a letter/notice it is deemed as being accepted in law…keep the postal receipt and either record the time and signature of whoever signed for it by writing it on the receipt or take a screenshot.

    I have completed the entire lawful process with regard to lawful dissent and the council tax (this process can be seen in the files of Practical Lawful Dissent – in two parts)…..I also took my case to a common law court. Even though I have all individuals concerned on Notice of treason they will not give up so be warned…..this is not to say don’t use the process because by doing so you will A) be educating individuals of treason B) collecting evidence of treason being committed by individuals on Notice of the evidence and C) if/when you are FORCED to comply with their demands you will be able to comply under duress of circumstances which keeps you within the common law…Maxim in law “Any Act done by me against my will is not my act”….you will not be admitting liability by complying this way, and will have a claim against all concerned once we have reasserted the common law within the entire judiciary, which we will have to succeed in doing if we are going to save our sovereignty.

    Note: The 1688/9 Bill of Rights is an unconstitutional statute that the barons also referred to it within their petition in 2001….The reason it is unconstitutional is by the fact that it removed the sole duty of the monarch to reject or grant government bills without consent of parliament. The Monarch has the sole duty under the Coronation Oath (which has also been illegally put into statute form th3ese days) to deny any government bills from being granted royal assent if they are contrary to the common law constitution….parliament has no say in the matter.

    Note: You do not need to send an Oath of allegince to a baron to be standing in lawful dissent/rebellion…declaring your standing within any Notice to an individual who has an oath of office is as good as creating an Oath…its all about intent and our lawful standing under the law. Creating an Oath and having three co signatory witnesses is also fine and preferable to the former mentioned declaration, you can log it under the common law court website also if you like. Lord Craigmyle is the most compliant of the existing barons and has received thousands of Oaths to date….you can see him in an interview with Caroline Stephens on You Tube. He and the other barons are impotent but that doesn’t really matter, they invoked article 61 according to the correct protocols of constitutional law and it is now up to the sovereign people to stand in defence of the constitution….the invocation can be said to be the direction that the barons gave the people.

    Note: Please be aware that defending yourself from a treasonous administration by using the four (4) notice process that we use in PLD is worth whille, but it will not change the fact that there are no lawful courts or police constables within our land. We the people will have to unite like they did on the fields of Runymede in 1215 to actually remedy the treason against us. All other groups fighting for justice in these times would all benefit from just one thing…reassertiing the common law (as it should be by law) within the entire judiciary and our society as a whole. We are working on this as I write.

    Entering their criminal courts is not advised by us in PLD….for some matters it may not be able to be avoided (under duress) but to enter them is to put yourself in harms way as these are corporate thugs not honourable men and women…they will breach their own rules to get the money they require or whatever, and to keep us servile to their treasonous regime…we see it all the time. Using the postal system by serving Notices on all concerned has proven in the past to be safer (read the Layman’s Guide to Lawful Rebellion to see successful processes used) but there is no guarantee that they will back off. The regime has become worse over the years and is more blatantly tyrannical than it was only 5 years ago. With power of attorney I prevented a committal order to prison for 7 days from being acted upon…this was done by using treason evidence and Article 61…the process I used can be seen within the Laymans guide. Finally…we do not refer to ourselves as rebels these days because it doesn’t accurately describe who we are. A rebel acts against the authority of a nation or enterprise whilst we are acting against the lack of authority which is an entirely differnt thing….I hope this information is useful to you.

    Regards. David Robinson.

    in reply to: magistrates court hearing for class b drug and neglect #37607
    David RobinsonDavid Robinson

    I Paul you are welcome to the information, I know paperwork can be difficult to get your head around, what to serve and how to write up Notices and/or Affidavits etc….if you do plan on using some paperwork to perhaps help in your cause, and if you are of facebook you can always take a look at paperwork my group members use in defence from the regime….the group is called Practical Lawful Dissent. There is also a website which our group is affiliated with called ‘Denounce The Deception’ that will have ‘The Layman’s Guide to Lawful Rebellion which has some examples of the paperwork we use.

    I am glad that your daughter is at least with a family member….I can only assume that you don’t get on with her nan. At least she is not under the so called protection of the SS. I am unsure what I would do with regard the allegations by police. They would have to have evidence to their claims for them to be legitimate of course. I may serve them a Notice demanding that the proof of allegations are supplied so that you can counter them.

    Nobody in truth has any authority over you and your child unless there is clear evidence of abuse of the child…and if there were then you would likely be in prison or whatever. If it were me in your situation I would focus on the police as said. I would deny the police any authority since they definitely have no lawful authority whilst aiding and abetting the treasonous regime as said previously…It may be better in your case to write a statement of truth putting all the facts within it under penalty of perjury and on your full commercial liability…such a document needs to be nothing but the truth and have evidence of the facts where possible. If you go after the police with regard to treason then they will just ignore you most likely so in your case I wouldn’t advise doing that at first anyway.

    I hope this has post been of some use…

    Regards David.

    in reply to: magistrates court hearing for class b drug and neglect #35075
    David RobinsonDavid Robinson

    Hi Paul…sorry to read of your troubles.

    I can only say what I would do in your situation, but its a difficult one as they have kidnapped your daughter. I hope she has been returned safely by now?

    Whereas all of the courts are now in private hands, running for profit in the corporate realm, whilst using anything but the law of our land I would conditionally accept the summons on proof that treason is not being committed and, that they are a court of law and not compounding treason.

    The evidence file of Treason (and there is a lot more evidence also) is called FCO 30/1048 which is in the public domain. I have taken on the Yeovil Courts over cannabis cultivation charges, I demanded that they show me the law that prohibits the cultivation, use, distribution of cannabis….there is no law against it only corporate treasonous rules.

    I published the process that I did at the time, with power of attorney for the friend who was busted for growing over 30 plants in the laymans guide to lawful rebellion, which can be seen on Denounce the Deception Website or within Fakebook group files ‘Practical Lawful Dissent’

    The end result was that the traitors within the CPS dropped the charges due to lack of evidence….I also used the treason within the series of Notices BTW. If you still haven’t got your daughter back it might be more risky to go up against them with treason, they don’t like being confronted with the evidenced facts and, they can do very little but ignore you or risk committing sedition by denying the evidence.

    I was (and still am) standing under the invocation of Article 61 of Magna Carta 1215, which provides us all with lawful excuse to not comply with anything of the crown and its institutions. Artile 61 was invoked according to the correct protocols of the common law constitution on the 23rd March 2001 (only reported in the Daily Mail and the Telegraph), thereofore cannot be denied without committing sedition at least.

    I hope you get something from this post even if you don’t use the information supplied.

    Kind regards David.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)