Sheriff Kinloch

5 months ago

Name: Sheriff Kinloch

Court: Livingston Sheriff Court

Defendant: David Paterson

Date: 28th March 2019

Before commencing the case in question, the Clerk of the Court asked the individual appearing if he would confirm that he was the named defendant (legal fiction), the individual confirmed that he was a living man and that he was not the legal fiction.

Sheriff Kinloch then intervened to try and establish that the individual appearing was the named legal fiction. Sheriff Kinloch was informed that the individual appearing before him was a living man and that he was there to deal with the issue at hand, the Sheriff refused to accept this.

Sheriff Kinloch then threatened the living man, stating that if he did not confirm that he was the named fiction, he would find him in contempt of court.

It was pointed out again that the individual was standing as a living man and that the fiction was a dead entity. At this point the procurator fiscal then asked for a warrant to be issued for the non-appearance of the defendant. Sheriff Kinloch then issued a warrant to arrest the living man for non-appearance and adjourned the court in the meantime while this matter was dealt with.

Note the following points:

1. The Procurator Fiscal and Sheriff Kinloch have failed to identify the defendant in the case.

2. As there had been no defendant identified, there was no case to answer.

3. The Sheriff had not established either authority or jurisdiction to deal with this issue.

4. In refusing to accept the living man before him, the Sheriff had tried to use criminal coercion to obtain the required result.

5. The behaviour used by the Sheriff was criminal and breached not only common law, but statutory law (rules) and the United Nations charter on human rights.

6. The living man who appeared, spoke to the Sheriff and answered questions, confirming that he was in attendance.

7. As ignorance of the law is not an excuse the sheriff has knowingly committed various criminal offences, against the living man and the people.

8. By issuing a warrant for the arrest of the living man, the Sheriff has confirmed that he is either incompetent and/or criminal.

9. Who pays the wages for the Procurator Fiscal and the Sheriff?

10. Do the Procurator Fiscal and Sheriff answer to the people?

Questions

  1. Is Sheriff Kinloch fit to sit as a Sheriff or should he be removed?
  2. If you appear before Sheriff Kinloch, would you allow him to hear your case? If not, you have the right to ask for another Sheriff.

Please use our comments box to leave a message.

3 Responses to “Sheriff Kinloch”

  1. margo tamm on May 9th, 2019 3:49 pm

    Answer:NO . I d ask this robotic: 1)can the Court make decisison over Living Being,man/woman?
    2)Does this sheriff has Unlimited Material Responsibility?
    3)Is the Court Sovereing ,and can the court Proove it INfront of International court of Justice?
    Until he cant answer those Questions,he has to leave the Court Room ,as he carried on ,he cant be TRUSTED, as acted ULTRA VIRES,and not fit for this Job,he has to quit.

  2. :Kevin-francis: of Brady family on May 24th, 2019 9:08 am

    Also how can they arrest a man whom they claim to be arresting because he was not there…….corollary of his absence I would think, and proof of the purposeful barratry of the sheriff which is criminal also.

  3. Josip Knez on June 2nd, 2019 2:52 pm

    I have had two experiences with judges issuing warrants for failing to appear in court while im starring at them the first time was when the judge asked me to state my date of birth for the court which I replied “I am under the assumption that hearsay is not permitted in court” which he replied “that is correct” and I then said “I cant state my date of birth to the court because my mother told me when I was born” and the second time it happened for failing to state my name to the court I said to the judge “how are the police going to arrest when you cant identify me as I stand in front of you” he started shuffling papers as I walked out and I stopped going to court there is just no point that was last september

What do you think?

You must be logged in to post a comment.