Lynda Thyer Update

4 months ago

I write to confirm that despite lodging paperwork with the Supreme Court for an appeal, I have been informed that they will not hear it.

The appeal was required because the High Court in London have refused to hear my challenge to the authority and jurisdiction of the courts and the crown and then they refused me an injunction hearing, to stay further action against Lynda Thyer.

Points to Note

  1. The government and the statutory courts obtain their authority from the people.
  2. The people created the government and the statutory courts.
  3. The government and statutory courts are fictions.
  4. Fictions cannot have authority over their creator.
  5. The statutory courts believe that they can ignore and an order issued by the Common Law Court and the people .
  6. Judges believe that they are not accountable for their behaviour.
  7. If you are refused the right to a hearing, how can this be lawful?

Not only must Justice be done, it must also be seen to be done.

 

To view the submitted papers click the links below.

Lawful Challenge                              Lord Chief Justice Letter

What do you think? Please leave your comment below.

 

If you wish to assist in this process, please use the contacts below. You can ask the Lord Chief Justice and/or the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice why this issue has not been dealt with, or you can demand an immediate hearing for John Smith, so as to determine the status of the arrest warrant and extradition order for LYNDA THYER.

DO WE HAVE JUSTICE IN THIS COUNTRY?

The Lord Chief Justice
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London
WC2A 2LL

Phone: 020 7947 6655 (Admin Court)
Email: administrativecourtoffice.generaloffice@hmcts.x.gsi.gov.uk

 

Rt Hon David Gauke MP
Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice
House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA

Tel: 020 7219 4459
Email: gauked@parliament.uk

 

 

 

6 Responses to “Lynda Thyer Update”

  1. paul knott on July 3rd, 2019 3:01 pm

    love it a lot of good info too thanks john

  2. Keith Jones on July 3rd, 2019 3:21 pm

    So if they have refused an injunction, what happens now? does it mean Common law enforcement agents will have to go after the judges and have them arrested and charged with malfeasance in office?

  3. William Young on July 3rd, 2019 11:08 pm

    It appears that the authorities continue to frustrate and block the efforts of women-men like Lyn and John without proper lawful rationale, communication, accountability and explanation. Perhaps illuminating certain truths and facts might provide reason that currently escapes most hence the persistence and the requirements of the return to common law courts. commonlawcourt.com that puts the people in direct control of democracy as it was originally prescribed with the travelling justices and therefore should be as such. Why the need for REPRESENTATIVES when each woman-man could vote directly 100 times a day if need be with today’s technology. The last 1000 years of BrItish history is peppered with authorities acting against the will of the people, thus the evolution of DEMOCRACY. The word democracy comes from demo=the people, cracy=power/sovereignty. The people preceded, and created parliament thus they are higher in status and rights. The people are made up from women-men who are living unlike parliament that is lifeless fiction without the capacity to contract. Parliament has been the means by which democracy is delivered since it was established some 80 years after 1215 Magna Carta. Today 2019, it would appear that there is confusion over the term and rights derived from the words “PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY”. How is parliament able to reason if its a non-living entity? Parliament is NOT the people. Parliament represents the people. The identifying of sovereignty/power is vital as there appears to be a desperate power grab being made. “PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY” appears to have been introduced when most people couldnt read nor write. Thereafter – present day, many assumptions and presumptions appear to have been made WITHOUT the CONSENT of the British people. What jars a bit is that the the law relies upon “Due-Process” especially to obtain fairness, yet the due-process required by Lyn & John appears to have ground to a halt. Why? A proper coherent explanation would be a good starting point.

  4. Derick Richard Ramsey on July 10th, 2019 10:10 pm

    is it possible to file the case to the echr being as this administration uk government ltd is displaying biligerance to the people, also file a lien against them.

  5. Keith Jones on August 29th, 2019 7:26 pm

    Yet another miracle natural cure for cancer kept a secret from us for over 40 years.
    https://pro.healthytips.report/p/AAH_freebookobamasrev_0418/WAAHV800/

  6. Keith Jones on August 29th, 2019 7:32 pm

    Please ignore that the above link is mostly about President Obama, it’s what’s contained within the video at the top of the page which everyone here will be more inteseted in.

What do you think?

You must be logged in to post a comment.