3 weeks ago
Welcome to world of property theft, the statutory courts (administrative hearings) and the mortgage industry.
On Tuesday 19th February 2019 the bailiffs failed to turn up to a property in Milton Keynes, despite serving paperwork confirming the date and time for the eviction.
Paperwork had been served to the interested parties confirming that they did not have a court order signed by a judge, the mortgage company had also created and used fraudulent paperwork (N49) to instruct the bailiffs to evict and that the bailiffs had also created a fraudulent document (EX96), which they then tried to use to evict the homeowners.
In addition to the above, the homeowners, a living man and woman, have confirmed their standing under common law by recording their births with the Common Law Court, they have obtained the ownership of the legal fictions attached to them and that their property has been transferred to the jurisdiction of the Common Law Court.
On the day of eviction a locksmith appeared but left after receiving a phone call, ten minuets before the planned eviction, he left. No bailiffs attended and the homeowner remained in his house.
On a final point the Common Law Court would also like to thank the individual men and women, who turned up on the day to assist and witness proceedings. By standing together, we can assert our birth rights and hold every individual accountable for committing crimes against the people.
3 weeks ago
Welcome to world of property theft, the statutory courts (administrative hearings) and the mortgage industry.
On Tuesday 29th January 2019, bailiffs turned up to a property in Portsmouth stating that they had obtained a possession order and that they were going to evict the owner. This, despite the fact that they did not have a court order signed by a judge, the mortgage company (Mortgages 1) had also created and used fraudulent paperwork (N49) to instruct the bailiffs to evict and that the bailiffs had also created a fraudulent document (EX96), which they then tried to use to evict the homeowner.
In addition to the above, the homeowner, a living man, has confirmed his standing under common law by recording his birth with the Common Law Court, he has obtained the ownership of the legal fiction attached to him and that his property has been transferred to the jurisdiction of the Common Law Court.
In attendance on the day, there were three bailiffs, a couple of locksmiths, a dog handler and two police constables, who were there to assist with the enforcement of statutory legislation. These individuals were also joined later by a police sergeant and after approximately an hour and a half, they all left empty handed while the homeowner remained in his house.
On a final point the Common Law Court would also like to thank the individual men and women, who turned up on the day to assist and witness proceedings. By standing together, we can assert our birth rights and hold every individual accountable for committing crimes against the people.
2 months ago
On the 28th October 2018 a Common Law Court was convened at the Hindley Labour Club, 2 Romford Street, Wigan WN2 3RB, to deal with the fraudulent and unlawful theft of a property.
The following individuals were summoned to attend and were all found guilty at this court by a jury of their peers:
Richard Klemmer, CEO Engage Credit
Kirran Kayani, Employee Pepper UK
Isabel Clough, Solicitor, Aberdein Considine
Click here for a copy of the court order
Despite the issued court order, Richard Klemmer authorised the sale of the property concerned while ignoring the authority of the people and that of the Common Law Court.
In January 2019, as the above individuals had failed to comply with the CLC Court Order, the issue was passed on to CLC Enforcement to deal with. On the 19th January 2019, CLC Enforcement with the assistance of eight agents from thought England, recovered the property and returned it to it’s rightful owner. The locks which had been changed were removed and replaced and the shutters which had been put up were also removed.
As part of the action by CLC Enforcement, all relevant parties were notified about what had happened and the police were informed about the a crimes that had taken place (CUP-19-012290). Despite having prima facie evidence confirming these crimes the police (PC2013) refused to take it, this Constable refused to send someone out to deal with it, he refused to take a statement and then closed the case.
In the mean time, the mortgage company again with the assistance of the previous parties have returned to the statutory court, seeking to re-instate the previous order for possession which was illegal and unlawful.
HOW CORRUPT ARE THE STATUTORY COURTS?
WE AWAIT THEIR ANSWER.
For copies of documents relating to this matter see below.
Letter to bailiffs Temporary Deputy Chief Constable
2 months ago
Interested Parties
 |
 |
 |
| District Judge Cook |
Helen McMillan |
Lord Burnett of Maldon Lord Chief Justice |
 |
 |
 |
|
Richard Klemmer CEO Engage Credit |
Isabel Clough Solicitor Aberdein Considine |
Kirran Kayani Pepper UK |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Mortgage Company | Solicitors | Asset Management Group | Estate Agents |
On Friday 5th October 2018, Pepper UK, trading as Engage Credit unlawfully repossessed a property which had been under the jurisdiction of the Common Law Court. The property referred to had been the subject of a statutory court hearing (administrative) with District Judge Cook who had been acting ultra vires, with bias, unlawfully and may be criminally.
Judge Cook did not have authority or jurisdiction to deal with this issue, he had not identified the defendant in the action, he ignored the lawfully issued documents from a superior court (Common Law Court), had refused to recuse himself when asked to do so and then issued an order for possession.
The mortgage company having fraudulently obtained an Order for Possession, then completed a N49 form and instructed the bailiffs to unlawfully take possession of the property. This N49 is not signed by a judge but by the mortgage company, it refers to land and not property and can only be used to evict a tenant not a homeowner.
The bailiffs in turn then created an EX96 which they then used to unlawfully evict the owner. This document is not signed by a judge, it does not allow them to evict a homeowner, it can only be used to evict someone from the land and not the property, they can only recover a limit of up to £5,000 and they CAN NOT USE ANY FORCE, EVEN REASONABLE to evict someone.
In doing so, the mortgage company and bailiffs have committed the following crimes, they have caused harm, loss and injury to a living man in addition to their fraudulent behaviour, regarding the existing contract. In addition to the common law crimes committed, the mortgage company and the bailiffs were also guilty of the following statutory offences:
1913 forgery act
Section 6-uttering
Section 11-aiding and abetting
criminal law act 1977 chapter 45.
OFFENCES RELATING TO ENTERING AND REMAINING ON PROPERTY
6 Violence for securing entry.
To view the documents served on the various parties click the pdf’s below:
CLC Enforcement RK CLC Enforcement IC CLC Enforcement KK
CLC Enforcement AMG CLC Enforcement Kings
For the CLC Enforcement in relation to this matter
click the logo below:
3 months ago
Date: 27th November 2018
Case Ref. 44LN0184518 REGINA V DEAN RENSHAW
Court: Isle of Wight, Magistrates Court
CPS Prosecutor Ann Smout
In the above case, the Prosecutor for the CPS confirmed that the Defendant could be either a living man or a legal fiction and that having raised the action they were required to identify the Defendant, in this case they identified the living man as the Defendant.
This information was also confirmed by the Clerk of the Court and the Magistrates; the case was then adjourned to the 7th February 2019.
The failure to identify the Defendant would have confirmed that there was no case to answer.
3 months ago
At an Appeal Court Hearing in Edinburgh on the 10th October 2018 (LIV-B560-17), Appeal Sheriff McCulloch confirmed that there was a distinction between the living man and the fiction.
The Defendant, in this case, had stated that he would like someone else to represent him. Despite the fact that this request was not submitted in writing Sheriff McCulloch stated that he would allow someone else to represent him on the condition that they accepted the jurisdiction of the court, this was refused as the individual concerned stated that he stood under common law jurisdiction.
Sheriff McCulloch in accepting this stance had confirmed that the living man not only had the right to stand under common law jurisdiction but that the court had no jurisdiction over him.
3 months ago
In relation to an appeal hearing on the 31st August 2018 (LIV-B560-17), Appeal Sheriff McCulloch confirmed that we currently have two separate jurisdictions operating, the statutory system and that of the Common Law Court.
Appeal Sheriff McCulloch also blatantly lied after he was informed that he worked for the Scottish Courts and Tribunal Service, Sheriff McCulloch stated that he was not paid by them had nothing to do with them, this despite the fact that he is listed a director and shown in a photo on the website.
Taken from the Scottish Courts Website https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/about-the-scottish-court-service
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service Board
Sheriff A Grant McCulloch
Sheriff McCulloch was a solicitor in private practice for 30 years. He was appointed a temporary Sheriff in 1992 and thereafter Sheriff in 2004, first in Dundee, and is currently senior Sheriff at Kirkcaldy. He is a graduate of Edinburgh University, in Law (1973) & Social Sciences (1974). He was a solicitor-advocate, from 1993.
3 months ago
In relation a hearing at Livingston Sheriff Court on 31st JANUARY 2018 (LIV-B560-17), Sheriff Edington confirmed that there was a distinction between the living man and a fiction.
When confronted with a man who had presented his Common Law Birth Certificate and who had claimed common law jurisdiction, Sheriff Edington confirmed that the court did not have any personal jurisdiction over the living man.
3 months ago
Assistance Required – Wednesday 19th December 2018
We are looking for witnesses and support in relation to the following case, if anyone can assist please do so.
The Complaint of the PROCURATOR FISCAL against
ROBERT SPROUL
and
JOHN SMITH
IN THE SHERIFF COURT OF NORTH STRATHCLYDE AT PAISLEY
St James Street, Paisley
10am, 19th December 2018
Court Ref: PA18004245
3 months ago
Assistance Required – Monday 17th December 2018
We are looking for witnesses and support in relation to the following case, if anyone can assist please do so.
claimant: Santander UK plc
and
defendant: Miss Kealey Emmins and Mr Paul Knott
IN THE COUNTY COURT OF Milton Keynes
351 Silbury Boulevard, Witan Gate East, Central Milton Keynes MK9 2DT
@ 12:00 on 17th December 2018
Claim No: E8PP7697