At an Appeal Court Hearing in Edinburgh on the 10th October 2018 (LIV-B560-17), Appeal Sheriff McCulloch confirmed that there was a distinction between the living man and the fiction.
The Defendant, in this case, had stated that he would like someone else to represent him. Despite the fact that this request was not submitted in writing Sheriff McCulloch stated that he would allow someone else to represent him on the condition that they accepted the jurisdiction of the court, this was refused as the individual concerned stated that he stood under common law jurisdiction.
Sheriff McCulloch in accepting this stance had confirmed that the living man not only had the right to stand under common law jurisdiction but that the court had no jurisdiction over him.
The Common Law Court has confirmed that it’s now lawful for men and women over the age of 18 to responsibly use and grow marijuana for medicinal purposes.
As Common Law rights are universal to all, then men and women should have the right to access the medicine they
so desperately need.
People have faced unimaginable obstacles, persecution and even prosecution, when all they are doing is acting in pursuit of a better quality of life.
Another result for the Common Law Court and the return of our justice system.
A third Common Law Court was convened in Leith on the 19th November 2017.
The court dealt with the request for Court Orders from five individuals who wished to assert their rights under Common Law. This request was required because of the failure of the Registers of Scotland and the Land Registry in England to protect the individuals rights.
An additional request was made to confirm that it is Lawful under Common Law for men and women over the age of 18, to use and grow the marijuana plant for medicinal purposes.
After a presentation to the jury and an examination of the supporting documents, the jury retired, deliberated and returned unanimous decisions for all cases.
Another result for the Common Law Court and the return of our justice system.
What a difference, to be tried by a jury of your peers.
YOU HAVE A CHOICE, stand under the statutory system or under common law.
Stand as a legal entity or as a man or woman.
There is NO RECORD of your birth under common law, the statutory system have you and for the privilege they demand you register your birth, or they fine you.
Record your details with the Common Law Court for preservation, you can do so under the Birth Certificate category. There is NO CHARGE for this service,
YOU HAVE A CHOICE, under the statutory system you are bound by their rules, you pay their fines, your pay their charges and you do as your told.
Under common law, we are all treated the same, as a man or a woman. There is no special treatment for the privileged, the law is common to all and everyone is held accountable for unlawfully behaviour.
NOW THERE’S A THOUGHT, HOW OFTEN ARE CORRUPT
OFFICIALS HELD ACCOUNTABLE?
You can now RECLAIM YOUR NAME by submitting your application to the Common Law Court.
As this LEGAL FICTION was created unlawfully, the Common Law Court will confirm that ownership of the LEGAL FICTION has been reclaimed by you. This information will be recorded with the Common Law Court in ‘The Book of Deeds,’ for preservation.
An application for OWNERSHIP OF THE FICTITIOUS NAME will only be accepted if you have already confirmed your birth under common law, this can be confirmed by recording your details under the Birth Certificate section.
September 16, 2017
Just recorded my birth details for preservation with the Common Law Court “Book of Deeds” and established myself as a living, breathing man, under common law.
I can now confirm that I am no longer a “LEGAL ENTITY” and have a birth certificate to prove it.
I wonder what this does to my standing in their statutory system?
Does this mean that if your child is no longer a legal entity, they no longer have a right to remove them?
If your child has been removed and you were to record their birth with the Common Law Court, does this mean that they have to return them? Well they would no longer have a lawful right to keep them.
A 2nd Common Law Court was convened in Glasgow on Sunday 10th September 2017.
This court dealt with a request for two Interdicts, to prevent the eviction, theft and sale of two family homes. After a presentation and an examination of the documents presented, the jury returned two unanimous decisions and issued the requested Interdicts.
Another result for the Common Law Court and the return of our justice system.
What a difference, to be tried by a jury of your peers.