The People v’s Suella Braverman

The People (Represented by John Smith)

and

Suella Braverman (Acting as The Attorney General, Rt. Hon. QC MP)

This case addresses the issue of crimes committed against the people by a living woman, Suella Braverman.

To highlight such crimes we refer you to Suella Braverman’s use of fraud, the judicial system, courts, police, kidnapping, unlawful detention, while also binding the people into slavery.

It should also be pointed out that Suella Braverman has assisted big business and a foreign country (France) to attack living men and women within this country.

To view the case file and lodged Exhibits please view the documents below:

 

Claim Form                Case File

 

Exhibit A                    Exhibit B                    Exhibit C                  Exhibit D

Exhibit E                    Exhibit F                     Exhibit G                 Void Order

 

RCJ Response           People’s Reply           Appeal Court

 

 

Ther People v’s Lynne Hobbs

The People (Represented by John Smith)

and

Lynne Hobbs (Acting as the Locality Reporter Manager)

 

This case addresses the issue of crimes committed against the people by a living woman, Lynne Hobbs.

To highlight such crimes we have referred to her kidnapping and unlawful detention of five children.

To assist in these crimes, Lynne has been using the judicial system, courts, police, councils, the Children’s Reporter and the healthcare system,  while binding the people into slavery.

To view the case file and lodged Exhibits please view the documents below:

 

Initial Writ               Case File

 

Exhibit 1                    Exhibit 2                     Exhibit 3a                 Exhibit 3b                    Exhibit 3c

Exhibit 3d                 Exhibit 3e                   Exhibit 4a                 Exhibit 4b                    Exhibit 4c

Exhibit 4d                 Exhibit 4e                   Exhibit 5                   Exhibit 6                      Exhibit 7

Exhibit 8                   Exhibit 9                     Exhibit 10                 Exhibit 11                     Exhibit 12

Exhibit 13                 Exhibit 14

 

 

Statutory Cases

It should be noted that all statutory courts (places of business) are registered companies, run for profit, they are NOT THERE FOR JUSTICE.

The links below refer to cases that have been or are being dealt with under this statutory system.

 

The People (represented by a living man John Smith)

v’s

Nicola Ferguson Sturgeon (the living woman, acting as The First Minister for Scotland)

This case addresses the issue of crimes committed against the people by a living woman, Nicola Ferguson Sturgeon.

To highlight such crimes we have referred to two separate issues, those associated with the covid legislation and the second relates to the fraud, kidnapping and unlawful detention of five children.

To assist in these crimes, Nicola Ferguson Sturgeon has been using the judicial system, courts, police, councils, the Children’s Reporter and the healthcare system,  while binding the people into slavery.

To view the case papers, click here

 

 

 

The People (Represented by a living man John Smith)

and

Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson 

(a living man, acting as the Prime Minister for Great Britain)

This case addresses the issue of crimes committed against the people by a living man, Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson.

To highlight such crimes we have referred to two separate issues, those associated with the covid legislation and the second relates to the fraud, kidnapping and unlawful detention of a living man and a living woman.

To assist in these crimes, Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson has been using the judicial system, courts, police, councils and the healthcare system,  while binding the people into slavery.

To view the case papers, click here

 

 

 

The People (Represented by John Smith)

and

Suella Braverman (Acting as The Attorney General, Rt. Hon. QC MP)

This case addresses the issue of crimes committed against the people by a living woman, Suella Braverman.

To highlight such crimes we refer you to Suella Braverman’s use of fraud, the judicial system, courts, police, kidnapping, unlawful detention, while also binding the people into slavery.

It should also be pointed out that Suella Braverman has assisted big business and a foreign country (France) to attack living men and women within this country.

To view the case papers, click here

 

 

 

The People (Represented by John Smith)

and

Lynne Hobbs (Acting as the Locality Reporter Manager)

This case addresses the issue of crimes committed against the people by a living woman, Lynne Hobbs.

To highlight such crimes we have referred to her kidnapping and unlawful detention of five children.

To assist in these crimes, Lynne Hobbs has been using the judicial system, courts, police, councils, the Children’s Reporter and the healthcare system,  while binding the people into slavery.

To view the case papers, click here

 

 

 

THE COMPLAINT of the PROCURATOR FISCAL

against

ROBERT SPROUL & JOHN SMITH   

Court Ref:   PA18004245 

This action was raised by the Procurator Fiscal in Scotland as three Sheriff’s (judge’s in Scotland) were served with a court summons to attend a Common Law Court, to answer for committing crimes against living men and women.

The crime committed by the accused was that they had sent threatening and intimidating paperwork to a Sheriff (a court summons) which they classified a breach of the peace.

                       

The Sheriff hearing the case (Mungo Bovey) and the Procurator Fiscal (Laura Mundell) in committing crimes against the people have used the judicial system, the courts, the police and fraud, while binding the people into slavery.

To view the case papers, click here

 

 

 

NO JURISDICTION

At an Appeal Court Hearing in Edinburgh on the 10th October 2018 (LIV-B560-17), Appeal Sheriff McCulloch confirmed that there was a distinction between the living man and the fiction.

The Defendant, in this case, had stated that he would like someone else to represent him. Despite the fact that this request was not submitted in writing Sheriff McCulloch stated that he would allow someone else to represent him on the condition that they accepted the jurisdiction of the court, this was refused as the individual concerned stated that he stood under common law jurisdiction.

Sheriff McCulloch in accepting this stance had confirmed that the living man not only had the right to stand under common law jurisdiction but that the court had no jurisdiction over him.

Medicinal Marijuana

November 22, 2017

The Common Law Court has confirmed that it’s now lawful for men and women over the age of 18 to responsibly use and grow marijuana for medicinal purposes.

As Common Law rights are universal to all, then men and women should have the right to access the medicine they

so desperately need.

People have faced unimaginable obstacles, persecution and even prosecution, when all they are doing is acting in pursuit of a better quality of life.

Another result for the Common Law Court and the return of our justice system.

3rd Common Law Court Convened

November 22, 2017

A third Common Law Court was convened in Leith on the 19th November 2017.

The court dealt with the request for Court Orders from five individuals who wished to assert their rights under Common Law. This request was required because of the failure of the Registers of Scotland and the Land Registry in England to protect the individuals rights.

An additional request was made to confirm that it is Lawful under Common Law for men and women over the age of 18, to use and grow the marijuana plant for medicinal purposes.

After a presentation to the jury and an examination of the supporting documents, the jury retired, deliberated and returned unanimous decisions for all cases.

Another result for the Common Law Court and the return of our justice system.

What a difference, to be tried by a jury of your peers.

The Creation Of The Statutory System

October 12, 2017

YOU HAVE A CHOICE, stand under the statutory system or under common law.

Stand as a legal entity or as a man or woman.

There is NO RECORD of your birth under common law, the statutory system have you and for the privilege they demand you register your birth, or they fine you.

Record your details with the Common Law Court for preservation, you can do so under the Birth Certificate category. There is NO CHARGE for this service,

YOU HAVE A CHOICE, under the statutory system you are bound by their rules, you pay their fines, your pay their charges and you do as your told.

Under common law, we are all treated the same, as a man or a woman. There is no special treatment for the privileged, the law is common to all and everyone is held accountable for unlawfully behaviour.

NOW THERE’S A THOUGHT, HOW OFTEN ARE CORRUPT

OFFICIALS HELD ACCOUNTABLE?

Reclaim Your Name

October 11, 2017

You can now RECLAIM YOUR NAME by submitting your application to the Common Law Court.

As this LEGAL FICTION was created unlawfully, the Common Law Court will confirm that ownership of the LEGAL FICTION has been reclaimed by you. This information will be recorded with the Common Law Court in ‘The Book of Deeds,’ for preservation.

An application for OWNERSHIP OF THE FICTITIOUS NAME will only be accepted if you have already confirmed your birth under common law, this can be confirmed by recording your details under the Birth Certificate section.

Birth Of A Man

September 16, 2017

Just recorded my birth details for preservation with the Common Law Court “Book of Deeds” and established myself as a living, breathing man, under common law.

I can now confirm that I am no longer a “LEGAL ENTITY” and have a birth certificate to prove it.

I wonder what this does to my standing in their statutory system?

Does this mean that if your child is no longer a legal entity, they no longer have a right to remove them?

If your child has been removed and you were to record their birth with the Common Law Court, does this mean that they have to return them? Well they would no longer have a lawful right to keep them.

2nd Common Law Court Convened

September 13, 2017

A 2nd Common Law Court was convened in Glasgow on Sunday 10th September 2017.

This court dealt with a request for two Interdicts, to prevent the eviction, theft and sale of two family homes. After a presentation and an examination of the documents presented, the jury returned two unanimous decisions and issued the requested Interdicts.

Another result for the Common Law Court and the return of our justice system.

What a difference, to be tried by a jury of your peers.